- Norm researches how people develop habits that serve them well or cause suffering, and is focused particularly on contemplative practices.
- Interoception is a sense of what is going on in our bodies. Bodily sensation comes from inside the skin- for example our heart beat is felt most through skin of chest. Interocpetion also includes what we do with that sensation- it is linked to our conceptual representations of what the sensations mean.
- There is not a thing such as pure perception- nothing is unadulterated. We always try to fit our perception to our interpretation.
- Even when signals are first hitting the brain they are already being compared to what it’s similar to.
- Initial thoughts on interoception were naive in that people thought more interoception was good and blocking sensation was bad. Want to have access to bodily signals, but also to regulate how much impact they have over mood or decision making. It comes down to a person’s interpretive framework.
- Most people out of touch with their bodies, but it’s too simplistic to say that if people got in more touch with their bodies they would do great. People with anxiety disorders have more awareness of their heartbeat. Interoceptive sensitivity is not a one way street into wellbeing.
- Panic attacks are an example of interoception gone awry. It is good to have a ping of butterflies in your stomach when public speaking, but n panic attacks there is catastrophization. “What if this is actually threatening to me?”
- Many contemporary health problems are a result of disregulated interoceptive processes.
- When people are aimlessly binge watching shows or mindlessly putting food in their mouths- or whatever self soothing there is- they are trying to get away from some discomfort in the body.
- Let the body be the canary in the coal mine. This isn’t to put the body above cognition- we can do incredible things with our minds- but there is a reason why intelligence doesn’t predict happiness for instance. We can get caught in a local maximum- doing the best we can do in a rational sense but that’s a limiting way of seeing the world.
- How are you going to escape a depressive self justification unless you can open up to conflicting information?
- Because the body is an untamed wilderness that’s a really rich place for inquiry.
- How does interoceptive awareness get integrated? We don’t have strong neural evidence for how it is substantiated in the brain.
- None of our perceptions are the actual thing.
- in situations where people have the misfortune to have part of the spinal cord severed and cannot receive input from bodies still they still can have rich emotional lives.
- Dimasio’s somatic marker hypothesis (in resources)
- Anhedonia is an example of pleasure signals not making their way through to the representation map. People are living less rich lives when they are not tapping into their bodies- we are cognitive misers and most of us live a life based on what has happened to us.
- A lot of the path is noticing things i do that make me or other people crazy. Without awareness that conditioning is running my behavior and conditions don’t change
- Things might seem darker before the dawn because you are coming into contact with how you have been conditioned. You need to open the door and see how cluttered and messy the room is before you can clean it out.
- Not all habit or behavior needs to be changed but to have deeper meaning one has to be around to witness what’s going on.
- Presence is allowing oneself to minimize the need to change or regulate what is occurring right now.
- At the heart of any regulatory state is a rejection of what is happening.
- The pursuit of happiness as a goal is self-defeating. Allowing experiences to play out without having to react to them.
- Agency- the feeling that one’s actions can effect desired outcomes in the world.
- Any systems that fire together wire together. The more we respond with the same response it’s more likely we will respond the same way in future.
- If you can do something to explore the quality of that stimulation you can starve the resources that would be allocated to responding to that stimulation.
- Thinking “don’t eat ice cream” is suppressive and we know in long term it’s not successful. As soon as we take energy away from “don’t eat ice cream” it’s the strongest signal. Stick with the sensory aspect of the stimulus arc. In doing that it is literally not reacting with overt behavior- we give the signal the attention not the non-desired outcome.
- How is interoception an intervention for chronic pain? There is evidence that paying attention to your body and not jumping into actions can turn down inflammatory markers. In the broader sense they are helpful because the suffering that comes from chronic pain is not the same thing as the sensory pain itself.
- In chronic pain conditions there is a recurring threat message coming from the body. The secondary appraisals about the ability to live the life one wants effects quality of life to a much greater degree than the pain signal itself. Migraine sufferers completely shut down when they feel one coming on. Yet every moment of a headache is not going to be peak intensity. Not every impending migraine is going to have the same catastrophic effect.
- How can people play with restoring interoception to a healthy state?
Norm Farb's site
The RAD Lab at the University of Toronto Mississagua
Norm Farb's publications
Paper we discussed: Interoception, contemplative practice, and health
Damasio- The Somatic Marker Hypothesis and the Possible Functions of the Prefrontal Cortex
If you’re inspired to support the show, you can do that here. You can also leave a review on iTunes or Stitcher , or simply tell your favorite body nerds about the show. It keeps the show rolling and connects us more as a community. Body nerds unite!